Multiplex, syndromic, testing, multiplex testing

Lecture de 5 m

7 janvier 2026

TENDANCES TECHNIQUES ET MALADIES

Article

Multiplex with Meaning: Cepheid’s Smart Approach to Molecular Diagnostic Testing

In an era where speed, accuracy, and clinical relevance are paramount, multiplex testing has emerged as a transformative force in molecular diagnostics. At Cepheid, we’ve long been committed to delivering rapid, actionable results that empower clinicians and improve patient outcomes. Our leadership in multiplex molecular testing reflects both our legacy of innovation and our vision for the future of diagnostics.

Our Editorial Team chatted with Dr. David Persing, Cepheid’s former Chief Medical and Technology Officer and current Senior Advisor, about multiplex panels and the near future.

What Are Multiplex and Syndromic Panels?
A multiplex panel is a molecular test that detects multiple genetic targets (pathogens, antimicrobial resistance genes, or other biomarkers) simultaneously from a single patient sample. Syndromic panels refer to multiplex tests that simultaneously detect multiple pathogens associated with overlapping symptoms,1.2 though the terms multiplex and syndromic are often used interchangeably.3

Why Are Multiplex Panels Important?
By providing multiple results in a single test, multiplex testing has the potential to improve operational efficiency, streamline diagnosis, and improve the quality of care.1.4 In clinical conditions for which distinct infectious agents can cause overlapping symptoms, such as respiratory infections, gastrointestinal illnesses, or sexually transmitted infections, multiplex testing can reduce diagnostic uncertainty, enable targeted antiviral or antibiotic therapies, and support antimicrobial stewardship.1

But not all panels are created equal.

But not all panels are created equal. The industry has seen a proliferation of larger panels,5 some of which may include pathogens with uncertain clinical relevance.6 This has led to concerns about over-testing, cost, and diagnostic ambiguity(5-7) — highlighting the need for diagnostic stewardship(8.9) and smart approaches to test design.

What is Cepheid’s History in Multiplex Testing?
Cepheid has a strong foundation in multiplex and syndromic testing and has demonstrated leadership in this space with several key products:

  • Multi-target test design enabled by multiplex technology is built into ‘targeted’ tests such as Xpert Xpress CoV-2 plus, which has three gene targets for robust detection of a single pathogen—SARS-CoV-2.
 
  • Xpert® Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus: A syndromic respiratory test that differentiates between SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and RSV—for addressing co-circulating viruses that cause overlapping respiratory symptoms. This test actually amplifies 10 distinct targets to detect four viruses. Here again, target redundancy is built into the test to accommodate potential genetic drift that is common among RNA viruses.
 
  • Xpert® Xpress MVP (Multiplex Vaginal Panel): A syndromic test that detects multiple causes of vaginitis, including four separate callouts: bacterial vaginosis (with targets for three vaginosis-associated anaerobic bacteria); Candida group (consisting of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. dubliniensis reported as a group); C. glabrata/C. krusei; and Trichomonas vaginalis. This was the first CLIA waived nucleic acid amplification test for vaginitis in the U.S.10
 
  • Xpert® Carba-R: A multiplex test that detects and differentiates gene sequences of the “big 5” carbapenemases, KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48 from carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE). These organisms have emerged as a global threat due to extensive antibiotic resistance.11
 
  • Xpert® MTB/XDR*: A multiplex test that detects mutations associated with resistance to multiple tuberculosis drugs, responding to a critical need for diagnostics to guide treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis, particularly in developing countries.12,13
Dr. David Persing

Is Cepheid Intensifying its Focus on Multiplex Testing?
The timing of our anticipated expansion into syndromic panels is no coincidence. The global healthcare landscape is evolving rapidly, with increasing demand for diagnostic tools that are not only fast and accurate but also clinically meaningful.

Cepheid’s strategy is driven by a clear need: clinicians require tools that deliver actionable insights, not just data. Our tests are designed to meet this need, aligning with best practices and regulatory expectations while maintaining the simplicity and reliability our customers expect.

 

What is Cepheid’s Approach?
Our approach to diagnostic testing remains steadfast. It is built on four pillars:

1.     Simplicity: Our Lab in a Cartridge™ technology automates the entire PCR process—nucleic acid extraction, amplification, and detection—within a self-contained cartridge. This innovation makes molecular testing fast and more accessible.

2.     Reliable answers: PCR technology is known for its high accuracy, but healthcare providers need more than a result. Which is why our approach to test design is grounded in quality and clinical relevance. We prioritize targets relevant to patient management, avoiding the inclusion of organisms with unclear clinical significance. And by integrating a suite of tests that allow clinicians to choose the right test for the right patient at the right time, we aim to promote diagnostic stewardship and optimized care.

3.     Broad menu: We have demonstrated clinical expertise across multiple disease areas, including respiratory infections, hospital-acquired infections, blood virology, women’s and sexual health, tuberculosis and emerging infectious diseases, and oncology and human genetics.

4.     Access: Cepheid’s GeneXpert® family of systems allows institutions of varying sizes—from small clinics to large hospitals—to perform molecular testing with minimal infrastructure. Our partnerships with governments, non-profits, and other organizations help us realize our commitment to expanding access to diagnostics worldwide.

What Does the Future Hold?
Cepheid continues to innovate and expand our test menu, focusing on fast, accurate, and accessible diagnostics. Looking ahead, we envision a multiplex test portfolio that spans multiple disease categories, complemented by targeted and low-plex testing to provide a flexible and versatile portfolio and enable diagnostic stewardship.

As we expand, we remain committed to our legacy of simplifying complex diagnostics and delivering answers that matter for our customers and the patients they serve.

 

Conclusion

By combining our heritage of innovation with a forward-looking approach to clinical utility and diagnostic stewardship, we are helping shape the future of diagnostics. And as always, we’re doing it with one goal in mind: better outcomes for patients, everywhere.

*Xpert MTB/XDR: CE-IVD not available in all countries. Non disponible aux États-Unis.

Other Xpert tests mentioned are IVD. In vitro diagnostic medical devices. Non disponible dans tous les pays.

† Product in development. Ne pas utiliser dans les procédures diagnostiques. Non examiné par un organisme de réglementation.

 

Références

1. Lewinski MA et al. Exploring the Utility of Multiplex Infectious Disease Panel Testing for Diagnosis of Infection in Different Body Sites: A Joint Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and Pan American Society for Clinical Virology. J Mol Diagn. 2023 Dec;25(12):857-875. doi: 10:1016/j.jmoldx.2023:08.005. Epub 2023 Sep 26. Erratum dans : J Mol Diagn. 2025 Mar;27(3):232. doi: 10:1016/j.jmoldx.2024:12.004. PMID : 37757952; PMCID : PMC11702286.

2. CMS.gov Local Coverage Determination (LCD) L39044. MolDX: Molecular Syndromic Panels for Infectious Disease Pathogen Identification Testing LCD - MolDX: Molecular Syndromic Panels for Infectious Disease Pathogen Identification Testing (L39044). Accessed October 2025.

3. Dumkow LE et al. Syndromic diagnostic testing: a new way to approach patient care in the treatment of infectious diseases. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Sep 23;76(Suppl 3):iii4-iii11. doi: 10:1093/jac/dkab245. PMID : 34555157; PMCID : PMC8460095.

4. American Society for Microbiology Guideline. Clinical Utility of Multiplex Tests for Respiratory and GI Pathogens. Août 2019. https://asm.org/guideline/clinical-utility-of-multiplex-tests-for-respirator. Accessed October 2025.

5 Schreckenberger PC, McAdam AJ. Point-Counterpoint: Large Multiplex PCR Panels Should Be First-Line Tests for Detection of Respiratory and Intestinal Pathogens. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Oct;53(10):3110-5. doi: 10:1128/JCM.00382-15. Epub 2015 Mar 11. PMID : 25762770; PMCID : PMC4572537.

6 Pender M et al. Syndromic Panel Testing Among Patients With Infectious Diarrhea: The Challenge of Interpreting Clostridioides difficile Positivity on a Multiplex Molecular Panel, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 10, Issue 5, May 2023, ofad184, https://doi.org/10:1093/ofid/ofad184

7. Jones BE. COUNTERPOINT: Should Multiplex Molecular Panels Be Performed on All Patients With Community Acquired Pneumonia? No. CHEST. 2025. Volume 167, Issue 1, 27 – 31 https://journal.chestnet.org/article/S0012-3692(24)05160-2/fulltext

8. Baghdadi JD et al. Diagnostic stewardship to support optimal use of multiplex molecular respiratory panels: A survey from the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Research Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Nov;44(11):1823-1828. doi: 10:1017/ice.2023:72. Publication électronique le 2023 mai 2. PMID : 37129035; PMCID : PMC10862355. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37129035/

9. Berry GJ et al. ADLM guidance document on laboratory diagnosis of respiratory viruses. [Édition électronique] J Appl Lab Med2 mai 2024, comme doi : 10:1093/jalm/jfae010. ADLM Guidance Document on Laboratory Diagnosis of Respiratory Viruses | myadlm.org Accessed October 2025

10. Van Der Pol et al. Evaluation of the user experience for a point of care molecular test for causes of vaginitis. BMC Infect Dis 25, 975 (2025). https://doi.org/10:1186/s12879-025-11304-8

11. Alvisi G et al. Epidemiology and Genetic Traits of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales: A Global Threat to Human Health. Antibiotiques. 2025; 14(2):141. https://doi.org/10:3390/antibiotics14020141

12. Bainomugisa A et al. 2020. New Xpert MTB/XDR: added value and future in the field. European Respiratory Journal 2020 56(5): 2003616; DOI: https://doi.org/10:1183/13993003:03616-2020

13. Omar SV et al. 2024. Performance evaluation of the Xpert MTB/XDR test for the detection of drug resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis among people diagnosed with tuberculosis in South Africa. J Clin Microbiol 62:e00229-24. https://doi.org/10:1128/jcm.00229-24

Cet article a-t-il été utile?
Powered by Translations.com GlobalLink Web SoftwarePowered by GlobalLink Web